Add LLM token

This commit is contained in:
wangwei
2026-07-02 22:03:39 +08:00
parent e3afb8a07a
commit 52e67b0e7b
36 changed files with 2392 additions and 394 deletions
+7 -1
View File
@@ -1,7 +1,13 @@
"""Initialize the app.application.agent package."""
from .services import AgentConversationService, AgentSessionFeedbackResult, AgentSessionService
from .agentic_service import AgenticConversationService
# Keep package boundaries explicit so backend imports stay predictable.
__all__ = ["AgentConversationService", "AgentSessionFeedbackResult", "AgentSessionService"]
__all__ = [
"AgentConversationService",
"AgentSessionFeedbackResult",
"AgentSessionService",
"AgenticConversationService",
]
@@ -0,0 +1,453 @@
"""Implement the Agentic RAG pipeline for multi-step reasoning (P0-1).
Architecture
------------
The pipeline adds four explicit reasoning steps before answer generation:
1. Intent Analysis — classify query type (simple_qa / compare / multi_hop / ambiguous)
2. Query Planning — for complex intents, decompose into focused sub-queries
3. Iterative Retrieval — retrieve for each sub-query, merge with deduplication
4. Grounding Check — verify retrieved context is sufficient; refine query when not
5. Answer Generation — stream final answer with citations (reuses AnswerGenerator)
Each step emits SSE ``thinking`` events so the frontend can render the live
reasoning trace. The pipeline is entirely synchronous and returns a generator so
it plugs into the same ``iter_in_thread`` pattern used by the existing chat routes.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import json
from dataclasses import dataclass, field
from typing import Generator
from loguru import logger
from app.application.knowledge import KnowledgeRetrievalService
from app.application.agent.hyde_expander import HyDEExpander
from app.config.settings import settings
from app.domain.conversation import ConversationStore
from app.domain.retrieval import RetrievedChunk
from app.infrastructure.llm.openai_compatible_answer_generator import OpenAICompatibleAnswerGenerator
from app.services.llm.llm_factory import get_llm_client
# ── Prompts ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
# Each prompt is kept module-level for easy review and fine-tuning.
_INTENT_SYSTEM = (
"You are a query classifier for a Chinese regulatory compliance knowledge base.\n\n"
"Classify the query into exactly one of:\n"
'- "simple_qa" : Single-hop, factual question about one regulation or clause\n'
'- "compare" : Comparison between two or more regulations, standards, or versions\n'
'- "multi_hop" : Requires chaining facts across multiple regulations to answer\n'
'- "ambiguous" : Too vague or broad to retrieve effectively\n\n'
"Return ONLY valid JSON — no markdown, no extra text:\n"
'{"type": "...", "reason": "one sentence", "requires_decomposition": true/false}\n\n'
'"requires_decomposition" must be true for compare and multi_hop types.'
)
_PLAN_SYSTEM = (
"You are a query planner for a Chinese regulatory compliance knowledge base.\n\n"
"Decompose the query into 2-4 focused, self-contained sub-queries that together fully "
"address the original question. Each sub-query must target one specific regulation, "
"clause, or concept and be independently searchable.\n\n"
"Return ONLY a valid JSON array — no markdown, no extra text:\n"
'["sub-query 1", "sub-query 2", ...]'
)
_GROUNDING_SYSTEM = (
"You are a grounding verifier for a regulatory compliance QA system.\n\n"
"Given a query and retrieved regulation passages, decide whether the passages contain "
"sufficient, accurate information to answer the query.\n\n"
"Return ONLY valid JSON — no markdown, no extra text:\n"
'{"sufficient": true/false, "confidence": 0.0-1.0, "reason": "one sentence", '
'"refined_query": "a more specific search query if not sufficient, else null"}'
)
# ── Result dataclasses ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
@dataclass
class IntentResult:
"""Capture the output of the intent-analysis step."""
type: str = "simple_qa"
reason: str = ""
requires_decomposition: bool = False
@dataclass
class GroundingResult:
"""Capture the output of the grounding-check step."""
sufficient: bool = True
confidence: float = 1.0
reason: str = ""
refined_query: str | None = None
# ── Service ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
class AgenticConversationService:
"""Multi-step Agentic RAG pipeline with live reasoning trace via SSE.
The service is intentionally synchronous so it can be wrapped in
``iter_in_thread`` by the route layer without any async boilerplate.
"""
def __init__(
self,
*,
retrieval_service: KnowledgeRetrievalService,
answer_generator: OpenAICompatibleAnswerGenerator,
conversation_store: ConversationStore,
) -> None:
"""Initialise with injected dependencies from the composition root."""
self.retrieval_service = retrieval_service
self.answer_generator = answer_generator
self.conversation_store = conversation_store
# HyDE expander is stateless — one instance shared for all requests.
self._hyde = HyDEExpander()
# ── Private helpers ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def _llm_json(
self,
system: str,
user: str,
provider: str | None,
model: str | None,
max_tokens: int = 300,
) -> dict | list | None:
"""Call the LLM with a JSON-only prompt and return the parsed result.
Returns ``None`` on any API or parse failure so callers can degrade
gracefully without raising.
"""
client = get_llm_client(
provider=provider or settings.llm_provider,
model=model or settings.llm_model,
)
resp = client.chat(
[{"role": "system", "content": system}, {"role": "user", "content": user}],
max_tokens=max_tokens,
temperature=0.1,
)
if not resp.is_success:
logger.warning("AgenticService LLM call failed: {}", resp.error)
return None
try:
raw = resp.content.strip()
# Strip accidental markdown code fences the model may add.
if raw.startswith("```"):
parts = raw.split("```")
raw = parts[1] if len(parts) > 1 else raw
if raw.startswith("json"):
raw = raw[4:]
return json.loads(raw.strip())
except (json.JSONDecodeError, IndexError) as exc:
logger.debug("AgenticService JSON parse failed: {} | raw={}", exc, resp.content[:200])
return None
def _analyze_intent(
self, query: str, provider: str | None, model: str | None
) -> IntentResult:
"""Classify query intent to select the appropriate retrieval strategy."""
data = self._llm_json(
_INTENT_SYSTEM,
f"Query: {query}",
provider,
model,
max_tokens=settings.agentic_intent_max_tokens,
)
if isinstance(data, dict):
return IntentResult(
type=str(data.get("type", "simple_qa")),
reason=str(data.get("reason", "")),
requires_decomposition=bool(data.get("requires_decomposition", False)),
)
return IntentResult(type="simple_qa", reason="fallback — classifier returned no JSON", requires_decomposition=False)
def _plan_queries(
self, query: str, intent_type: str, provider: str | None, model: str | None
) -> list[str]:
"""Decompose a complex query into focused, independently-retrievable sub-queries."""
data = self._llm_json(
_PLAN_SYSTEM,
f"Original query ({intent_type}): {query}",
provider,
model,
max_tokens=settings.agentic_plan_max_tokens,
)
if isinstance(data, list) and data:
# Cap at configured maximum to keep latency predictable.
return [str(q) for q in data[:settings.agentic_max_sub_queries] if q]
return [query]
def _check_grounding(
self,
query: str,
chunks: list[RetrievedChunk],
provider: str | None,
model: str | None,
) -> GroundingResult:
"""Verify whether retrieved chunks are sufficient to ground an accurate answer.
Uses a fast score-threshold heuristic first; falls back to an LLM call only
when scores are borderline so that the happy-path adds no extra latency.
"""
if not chunks:
return GroundingResult(
sufficient=False,
confidence=0.0,
reason="未检索到相关内容",
refined_query=None,
)
avg_score = sum(c.score for c in chunks) / len(chunks)
# Fast path: high-confidence retrieval → skip extra LLM call.
if avg_score > settings.agentic_grounding_threshold and len(chunks) >= 3:
return GroundingResult(
sufficient=True,
confidence=round(avg_score, 3),
reason="检索置信度充足,无需二次查询",
refined_query=None,
)
# LLM-based grounding check for borderline retrievals.
context_preview = "\n".join(
f"[{i + 1}] (score={c.score:.2f}) {c.text[:200]}" for i, c in enumerate(chunks[:5])
)
data = self._llm_json(
_GROUNDING_SYSTEM,
f"Query: {query}\n\nRetrieved passages:\n{context_preview}",
provider,
model,
max_tokens=settings.agentic_grounding_max_tokens,
)
if isinstance(data, dict):
return GroundingResult(
sufficient=bool(data.get("sufficient", True)),
confidence=float(data.get("confidence", 0.5)),
reason=str(data.get("reason", "")),
refined_query=data.get("refined_query") or None,
)
return GroundingResult(sufficient=True, confidence=0.5, reason="grounding check skipped (parse error)", refined_query=None)
@staticmethod
def _intent_to_template(intent_type: str) -> str:
"""Map an intent type to the best prompt template name for answer generation."""
mapping = {
"compare": "comparison",
"multi_hop": "compliance_qa",
"simple_qa": "compliance_qa",
"ambiguous": "compliance_qa",
}
return mapping.get(intent_type, "compliance_qa")
@staticmethod
def _deduplicate(chunks: list[RetrievedChunk], max_chunks: int) -> list[RetrievedChunk]:
"""Remove duplicate chunk IDs, preserving first-occurrence order up to max_chunks."""
seen: set[str] = set()
result: list[RetrievedChunk] = []
for chunk in chunks:
if chunk.chunk_id not in seen:
seen.add(chunk.chunk_id)
result.append(chunk)
if len(result) >= max_chunks:
break
return result
# ── Public interface ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
def stream_agentic_chat(
self,
*,
query: str,
session_id: str | None = None,
filters: str | None = None,
provider: str | None = None,
model: str | None = None,
top_k: int = 5,
context_text: str | None = None,
context_filename: str | None = None,
) -> tuple[str, Generator[dict, None, None]]:
"""Run the full Agentic RAG pipeline and return ``(session_id, event_generator)``.
When context_text is provided (user-attached document) it is:
- Summarised and prepended to the intent-analysis prompt so the classifier
understands what kind of question is being asked.
- Treated as baseline grounding so the pipeline skips unnecessary retries
when the document itself is the primary source.
- Passed to the answer generator so the LLM sees the full document alongside
retrieved regulation chunks.
The generator yields SSE event dicts compatible with the route's
``iter_in_thread`` pattern.
"""
session = self.conversation_store.get_session(session_id) if session_id else None
if session is None:
session = self.conversation_store.create_session()
self.conversation_store.save_message(session.session_id, role="user", content=query)
history = [{"role": msg.role, "content": msg.content} for msg in session.messages[-10:]]
active_session_id = session.session_id
# Build a brief document summary for classifier/planner prompts (avoid
# passing the full text which could overwhelm small-context LLMs).
_doc_summary: str = ""
if context_text and context_text.strip():
_doc_label = context_filename or "document"
_preview = context_text.strip()[:400]
_doc_summary = f"[User has attached document: {_doc_label}]\nDocument preview: {_preview}\n\n"
def event_stream() -> Generator[dict, None, None]:
"""Execute all pipeline steps and yield SSE events."""
# ── Step 1: Intent Analysis ──────────────────────────────────────
yield {"event": "thinking", "data": {"step": "intent_analysis", "status": "running"}}
# Prepend doc summary so the classifier knows what the user is asking about
intent_user_msg = f"{_doc_summary}Query: {query}" if _doc_summary else f"Query: {query}"
data = self._llm_json(
_INTENT_SYSTEM, intent_user_msg, provider, model,
max_tokens=settings.agentic_intent_max_tokens,
)
if isinstance(data, dict):
intent = IntentResult(
type=str(data.get("type", "simple_qa")),
reason=str(data.get("reason", "")),
requires_decomposition=bool(data.get("requires_decomposition", False)),
)
else:
intent = IntentResult(type="simple_qa", reason="fallback", requires_decomposition=False)
logger.debug("Agentic intent: type={} decompose={}", intent.type, intent.requires_decomposition)
yield {
"event": "thinking",
"data": {
"step": "intent_analysis",
"status": "done",
"intent_type": intent.type,
"reason": intent.reason,
"requires_decomposition": intent.requires_decomposition,
},
}
# ── Step 2: Query Planning ───────────────────────────────────────
sub_queries: list[str] = [query]
if intent.requires_decomposition:
yield {"event": "thinking", "data": {"step": "query_planning", "status": "running"}}
plan_user_msg = f"{_doc_summary}Original query ({intent.type}): {query}" if _doc_summary else f"Original query ({intent.type}): {query}"
data_plan = self._llm_json(
_PLAN_SYSTEM, plan_user_msg, provider, model,
max_tokens=settings.agentic_plan_max_tokens,
)
if isinstance(data_plan, list) and data_plan:
sub_queries = [str(q) for q in data_plan[:settings.agentic_max_sub_queries] if q]
logger.debug("Agentic sub-queries ({}): {}", len(sub_queries), sub_queries)
yield {
"event": "thinking",
"data": {"step": "query_planning", "status": "done", "sub_queries": sub_queries},
}
# ── Step 3: Iterative Retrieval ──────────────────────────────────
# Always retrieve using the user's original question (NOT the document
# text) so embedding quality is preserved for regulation matching.
# HyDE enriches the retrieval query with a short hypothetical answer
# to close the vocabulary gap between terse queries and long documents.
candidate_k = max(top_k * 3, 15)
all_chunks: list[RetrievedChunk] = []
# For simple_qa with a single query, HyDE gives the biggest benefit
# (bridging vague/colloquial questions to formal document language).
# For compare/multi_hop, the planner already decomposed into precise
# sub-queries, so HyDE is less critical but still applied per sub-query.
for idx, sq in enumerate(sub_queries, start=1):
yield {
"event": "thinking",
"data": {"step": "retrieving", "status": "running", "query": sq, "index": idx, "total": len(sub_queries)},
}
# HyDE expansion: generate hypothetical answer, embed it for retrieval.
# Falls back to original sub-query if LLM call fails.
retrieval_query = self._hyde.expand(sq)
chunks = self.retrieval_service.retrieve(query=retrieval_query, top_k=candidate_k, filters=filters)
all_chunks.extend(chunks)
yield {
"event": "thinking",
"data": {"step": "retrieving", "status": "done", "query": sq, "index": idx, "total": len(sub_queries), "found": len(chunks)},
}
unique_chunks = self._deduplicate(all_chunks, max_chunks=top_k * 4)
# ── Step 4: Grounding Check ──────────────────────────────────────
yield {"event": "thinking", "data": {"step": "grounding_check", "status": "running"}}
# When the user has attached a document, the document itself provides
# baseline grounding — skip the re-query loop to avoid the LLM asking
# "please provide the document text" as a refined query.
if context_text and context_text.strip():
grounding = GroundingResult(
sufficient=True,
confidence=0.95,
reason="用户已附件上传文档,以文档内容为基础作答",
refined_query=None,
)
else:
grounding = self._check_grounding(query, unique_chunks, provider, model)
yield {
"event": "thinking",
"data": {
"step": "grounding_check",
"status": "done",
"sufficient": grounding.sufficient,
"confidence": grounding.confidence,
"reason": grounding.reason,
},
}
# Only retry from vector store when no document is attached and grounding failed
if not grounding.sufficient and grounding.refined_query and not context_text:
logger.info("Grounding insufficient — re-querying: {}", grounding.refined_query)
yield {
"event": "thinking",
"data": {"step": "retrieving", "status": "running", "query": grounding.refined_query, "index": 1, "total": 1, "retry": True},
}
# Apply HyDE to the refined query as well for better retrieval.
refined_hyde_query = self._hyde.expand(grounding.refined_query)
refined_chunks = self.retrieval_service.retrieve(query=refined_hyde_query, top_k=candidate_k, filters=filters)
all_chunks.extend(refined_chunks)
unique_chunks = self._deduplicate(all_chunks, max_chunks=top_k * 4)
yield {
"event": "thinking",
"data": {"step": "retrieving", "status": "done", "query": grounding.refined_query, "index": 1, "total": 1, "found": len(refined_chunks), "retry": True},
}
final_chunks = unique_chunks[:top_k]
# ── Step 5: Answer Generation ────────────────────────────────────
sources_payload = [s.__dict__ for s in self.answer_generator._sources(final_chunks)]
yield {"event": "sources", "data": sources_payload}
answer_parts: list[str] = []
for event in self.answer_generator.stream_generate(
query=query,
retrieved_chunks=final_chunks,
history=history,
provider=provider,
model=model,
prompt_template=self._intent_to_template(intent.type),
context_text=context_text,
context_filename=context_filename,
):
if event.get("event") == "content":
answer_parts.append(str(event.get("data", "")))
yield event
full_answer = "".join(answer_parts)
self.conversation_store.save_message(
active_session_id,
role="assistant",
content=full_answer,
sources=sources_payload,
)
return active_session_id, event_stream()
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
"""Implement HyDE (Hypothetical Document Embeddings) query expansion.
HyDE improves dense retrieval by addressing the vocabulary gap between
short user queries and longer document passages:
User query → [LLM generates hypothetical answer]
embed hypothetical answer (not original query)
retrieve similar real passages from Milvus
The hypothetical answer uses the same vocabulary and phrasing as documents,
so its embedding is much closer to relevant chunks than a terse query embedding.
Usage:
expander = HyDEExpander()
retrieval_query = expander.expand(query, provider=..., model=...)
chunks = retrieval_service.retrieve(query=retrieval_query, ...)
When the LLM call fails, expand() falls back to the original query so the
retrieval pipeline degrades gracefully.
References:
Gao et al. (2022), "Precise Zero-Shot Dense Retrieval without Relevance Labels"
https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10496
"""
from __future__ import annotations
from loguru import logger
from app.config.settings import settings
from app.services.llm.llm_factory import get_llm_client
# Maximum chars to trim from the hypothetical answer to avoid token overrun.
_MAX_HYPOTHESIS_CHARS = 600
# System prompt that instructs the LLM to write a passage *as if* it were
# from a regulatory document, not a conversation answer.
_HYDE_SYSTEM = (
"你是一位法规知识库专家。用户提出了一个问题,"
"请用50-120字写一段话,模拟如果相关法规文档中存在完美答案,"
"该段落会是什么内容。\n\n"
"要求:\n"
"- 使用与法规文档相同的正式书面语气\n"
"- 包含可能的条款编号、标准名称等关键术语\n"
"- 不要解释你在做什么,直接输出假设性段落\n"
"- 如问题过于模糊,写一段合理的通用法规说明"
)
class HyDEExpander:
"""Generate a hypothetical document passage to improve dense retrieval.
The expander is stateless — instantiate once and call expand() per query.
It requires no external dependencies beyond the project's existing LLM
client infrastructure.
"""
def expand(self, query: str) -> str:
"""Return a combined retrieval query: original query + hypothetical passage.
The combination ensures:
- Dense retrieval uses the enriched hypothetical text (semantic match).
- BM25 retrieval still benefits from the original query keywords.
The model used is ``settings.hyde_llm_model`` (dedicated lightweight model)
falling back to the main ``settings.llm_model`` when not configured.
If the LLM call fails for any reason, returns the original query unchanged.
"""
if not settings.hyde_enabled:
return query
# Use the dedicated HyDE model when configured; fall back to main LLM.
# A lightweight model (e.g. qwen3.5-flash) is sufficient for generating
# a short hypothetical passage and significantly reduces cost + latency.
provider = settings.hyde_llm_provider or settings.llm_provider
model = settings.hyde_llm_model or settings.llm_model
try:
client = get_llm_client(provider=provider, model=model)
resp = client.chat(
messages=[
{"role": "system", "content": _HYDE_SYSTEM},
{"role": "user", "content": f"问题:{query}"},
],
max_tokens=settings.hyde_max_tokens,
# Low temperature: we want a plausible, deterministic passage.
temperature=0.3,
)
if not resp.is_success or not resp.content:
logger.debug("HyDE LLM call failed or empty — using original query")
return query
hypothesis = resp.content.strip()[:_MAX_HYPOTHESIS_CHARS]
logger.debug("HyDE expanded query ({}{} chars)", len(query), len(hypothesis))
# Concatenate: the embedding model will see the full combined text,
# so the resulting vector leans toward the hypothetical document style.
return f"{query}\n\n{hypothesis}"
except Exception as exc: # noqa: BLE001 — intentional broad catch for graceful fallback
logger.warning("HyDE expansion failed: {} — using original query", exc)
return query
+20 -2
View File
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ from app.domain.conversation import AnswerGenerator, AnswerResult, ConversationS
from app.domain.retrieval import RetrievedChunk
from app.application.knowledge import KnowledgeRetrievalService
from app.application.agent.hyde_expander import HyDEExpander
# Keep orchestration logic centralized so use-case flow stays easy to trace.
@@ -26,6 +27,8 @@ class AgentConversationService:
self.retrieval_service = retrieval_service
self.answer_generator = answer_generator
self.conversation_store = conversation_store
# Shared HyDE expander — stateless, safe for reuse across requests.
self._hyde = HyDEExpander()
def ask(
self,
@@ -108,14 +111,26 @@ class AgentConversationService:
model: str | None = None,
top_k: int = 5,
prompt_template: str | None = None,
context_text: str | None = None,
context_filename: str | None = None,
) -> tuple[str, Generator[dict, None, None]]:
"""Stream chat for the Agent Conversation Service instance."""
"""Stream chat for the Agent Conversation Service instance.
When context_text is provided the user's document is passed directly to
the answer generator — RAG retrieval still runs on the user's question
(not the document text) to find relevant regulation passages.
"""
session = self.conversation_store.get_session(session_id) if session_id else None
if session is None:
session = self.conversation_store.create_session()
self.conversation_store.save_message(session.session_id, role="user", content=query)
history = [{"role": msg.role, "content": msg.content} for msg in session.messages[-10:]]
retrieved = self.retrieval_service.retrieve(query=query, top_k=top_k, filters=filters)
# HyDE: expand the query with a hypothetical answer to improve dense retrieval.
# For document-context queries, skip HyDE since the document itself guides retrieval.
retrieval_query = self._hyde.expand(query) if not context_text else query
# Retrieve using the enriched query — NOT the document text —
# so embedding quality is preserved for regulation chunk matching.
retrieved = self.retrieval_service.retrieve(query=retrieval_query, top_k=top_k, filters=filters)
def event_stream() -> Generator[dict, None, None]:
"""Handle event stream for the Agent Conversation Service instance."""
@@ -129,6 +144,8 @@ class AgentConversationService:
provider=provider,
model=model,
prompt_template=prompt_template,
context_text=context_text,
context_filename=context_filename,
):
if event.get("event") == "sources":
sources_payload = event.get("data", [])
@@ -189,3 +206,4 @@ class AgentSessionService:
raise ValueError("消息索引不存在")
# Preserve the existing API behavior until a persistent feedback store is introduced.
return AgentSessionFeedbackResult(session_id=session_id, message_index=message_index)