Regulation chat

# Ask clause-level questions with citations intact.

The chat surface is tuned for compliance follow-up after analysis. Conversation history stays visible, quick prompts speed common queries, and the right rail keeps cited standards inspectable while the answer streams.

From analysis workspace Session synced

## History

3 recent threads
Roof crush resistance wording
Started 10:14 · 5 replies · linked to GB 26112-2010
R155 incident log retention
Started yesterday · 8 replies · cybersecurity watch
Thermal runaway evidence checklist
Started Monday · 4 replies · supplier dossier

## Quick questions

Common prompts

## Active thread

Chunk 148 · GB 26112-2010 context
Reviewer 10:14

Does this paragraph need a numeric load statement, or is the current "meets national crush-resistance requirements" wording enough?

Compliance assistant 10:14

The current wording is not sufficient on its own. The retrieved primary citation, GB 26112-2010 §4.2, defines a measurable resistance requirement. To make the dossier auditable, the paragraph should state the tested load threshold and link the supporting report.

Primary citation: GB 26112-2010 §4.2 · lead match for the current paragraph · linked body engineering report candidate
Reviewer 10:16

Draft the exact replacement sentence I can hand back to the body structure team.

Compliance assistant 10:16

Use: "The roof support structure was validated in accordance with GB 26112-2010 §4.2; supporting evidence is documented in the linked body engineering report."

Evidence used: GB 26112-2010 §4.2, internal engineering report reference, related C-NCAP context kept as secondary only.
Citations stay attached to each answer and are exportable with the thread.

## Citation rail

Sources in current answer
GB 26112-2010 §4.2
Primary mandatory requirement used to justify the numeric threshold.
Reason surfaced: direct match on roof crush resistance wording and the validation requirement.
Linked body engineering report
Internal evidence artifact proposed for linking into the final dossier.
The relevant static load summary should be attached before final sign-off.
C-NCAP rulebook §3.1
Contextual safety framing only, not the basis of the compliance statement.
Kept in thread for reviewer context but not recommended as the lead citation.